on controversial changes to the district’s sex education curriculum. The vote likely will include whether to start instruction on gender ideology in elementary school, as recommended by the district’s ideologically homogeneous
As a strategy, the district’s leadership is known for its questionable timing on controversial votes and notifications. Most recently, the superintendent, Michelle Reid, waited until 4:27 p.m. last Friday to inform parents that they would need to find babysitters on seven Monday afternoons next academic year due to increased allowances for. The date and time of the message were far from coincidence.
The district leadership redundantly claims to be for inclusion and transparency, but its actions suggest the opposite. From my personal experience as a parent in the district, leadership’s goal is to include only all the parents and residents who agree with its plans and withhold information from and ignore the rest. For example, I was forced to pay $280 on a Freedom of Information Act request for my son’s “social emotional learning” curriculum materials.
The school board’s members have the same tendency as Reid regarding strategically inconvenient timing of major decisions and notifications. Members of the last board scheduled votes on controversial policies, such as theat the helm as its chairman, is voting on changes to the sex education curriculum in the summer and during the historic presidential debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.
Reid was correct to foreshadow that the majority of parents don’t get to choose what they want for their children. Instead, Reid and the school district’s tyrannical transgender activists do.
Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: mynbc15 - 🏆 262. / 63 Read more »