Supreme Court student loan case: The arguments explained

  • 📰 FOX29philly
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 56 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 26%
  • Publisher: 51%

Education Education Headlines News

Education Education Latest News,Education Education Headlines

The Supreme Court is about to hear arguments over President Joe Biden’s student debt relief plan, which impacts millions of borrowers who could see their loans wiped away or reduced.

So far, Republican-appointed judges have kept the Democratic president’s plan from going into effect, and it remains to be seen how the court, dominated 6-3 by conservatives, will respond. The justices have scheduled two hours of arguments in the case Tuesday, though it will probably go longer. The public can listen in on the court’s website beginning at 10 a.m. EST.

College students qualify if their loans were disbursed before July 1. The plan makes 43 million borrowers eligible for some debt forgiveness, with 20 million who could have their debt erased entirely, according to the Biden administration. A lower court dismissed the lawsuit involving the following states: Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and South Carolina. The court said the states could not challenge the program because they weren’t harmed by it. But a panel of three federal appeals court judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit — all of them appointed by Republican presidents — put the program on hold during an appeal. The Supreme Court then agreed to weigh in.

Texas-based U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman, an appointee of President Donald Trump, sided with the students and ruled to block the program. Pittman ruled that the Biden administration did not have clear authorization from Congress to implement the program. A federal appeals court left Pittman’s ruling in place, and the Supreme Court agreed to take up the case along with the states’ challenge.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

This is an insult to all of us who WORKED to play off our student loans.

Pay 👏🏼 Your 👏🏼Own 👏🏼 Debts👏🏼

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 570. in EDUCATİON

Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Justice Thomas Moore Has Personal Experience With Student LoansThe Supreme Court won’t have far to look for a personal take on the “crushing weight” of student debt that underlies the Biden administration’s college loan forgiveness plan. Thomas Moore? He'll still vote against any relief. That's the kind of person he is. Take a little lookie loo at his wife and her lovely persona.
Source: nbcbayarea - 🏆 596. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court to hear GOP state challenge to pandemic-related Biden student loan debt relief planThe U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments Tuesday pertaining to GOP-led states aiming to block President Biden's student debt forgiveness plan. When Biden was a Sen. He made a law that students could NOT write off school debit during bankruptcy. Universities supported this. After that, Universities and college started raising tuition to go to school. If some decides to go to school. They pay the bill, not the public
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Who are the attorneys fighting Biden's costly student loan relief at the Supreme Court?The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Feb. 28 in two cases to decide the fate of President Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness program. It's a bailout. Call it a bailout. Due diligence on the judges a must. Just Say NO .
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Supreme Court’s Student-Loan Case Will Test Limits of Presidential PowerArguments begin Tuesday over the Biden administration’s roughly $400 billion plan to forgive federal student debt for tens of millions of borrowers, giving justices an opportunity to set strict limits over the president’s ability to implement policies without explicit authorization from Congress. NO. Next question? absolutely NOT This case has to do with constitutional limits on which branch of the government can initiate spending….. nothing else…..
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »