Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations., where it is constrained by the NNPDF4.0 global dataset. Subsequently, it is transformed to the 3FNS where it provides the intrinsic charm component.
The kinematic coverage in the plane covered by the 4,618 cross-sections used for the determination of the charm PDF in the present work. These cross-sections have been classified into the main different types of processes entering the global analysis.In Section A we summarize the main features of the EKO evolution framework used to transform the charm PDF from the 4FNS to the 3FNS.
There’re no quarks: nature doesn’t allow fractional charges. No gluons either: the 2 fundamental charges are the “glue”. There’s no infinite number of quark-antiquark pairs: just relativistically rotating electron-positron pairs. You can’t call yourself Nature unless you get this
When one of the most prestigious scientific publications is publishing such nonsense as science, you know how fuck*d up the world has become. No wonder you are claiming a universe with 95% of dark things. What religion fails to achieve, science has delivered: darkness.
Using simple logic, you can’t have more than one elementary particles: no way to interact. Don’t you need another “strong gluon” to glue quarks & gluons together? Etc. You also ignore the function of the two fundamental charges: to glue, to bind, to attract. So blind, incredible.
Pure nonsense. The whole quark discourse was just a mathematical attempt to make sense of observed data, that somehow it matched something doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the correct description. Too many holes, eg fractional charges, no free quarks, “gluons”. See pic for the truth
Yeah cuz we totally know what that is
Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Nature - 🏆 64. / 68 Read more »