Supreme Court immunity ruling has a chilling historical parallel

  • 📰 MSNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 51%

MSNBC News

Education Education Latest News,Education Education Headlines

The fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision on Donald Trump’s presidential immunity continues to unfold as the future of democracy remains uncertain. Sherrilyn Ifill, Endowed Chair in Civil Rights at Howard University, joins Joy Reid to warn voters.

“We are writing a rule for the ages,” Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch declared this year during oral arguments in Trump v. United States. Little did the country know then that Gorsuch’s statement was more than a prediction; it was a threat. On Monday, the court’s conservative majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, ruled that the president has at least presumptive immunity for all official acts and absolute immunity for “the exercise of his core constitutional powers.

The Civil Rights Cases of 1883 rejected the contention that the 13th and 14th amendments allowed Congress to outlaw racial discrimination. And most infamously, the court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that the 14th Amendment granted nonwhite Americans only legal, not social equality — a standard that it declared satisfied by the perverse doctrine of “separate but equal.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 469. in EDUCATİON

Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines