Concrete crisis: Officials thought asbestos in schools was safe too—the same mistakes have been made over Raac

to commit to a 40-year deadline to remove all asbestos in schools. Central to this reasoning is the idea that there is an"acceptable" level of risk for asbestos exposure in schools. The government said that it"currently has a mature and comprehensive plan to managing legacy asbestos risks".

The danger of the approach of managing—but not removing—risks can be seen in the rapidly spiraling Raac crisis. Like asbestos, a known problem with potentially devastating consequences was considered to be manageable until it was suddenly proven not to be. Nancy Tait's report on the Enfield school included a wealth of evidence, including detailed summaries and reviews of technical literature on asbestos products. It also gave a voice to those directly affected, through the names and stories of 16 people who had died fromPutting names to the numbers is an important way to challenge ideas about managing acceptable risk.

The Raac scandal lays bare the fallibility of expert evaluations, at significant risk to the public. What is considered safe one day can be considered critically dangerous the next. Continuing to rely on the management of risk only will not result in a

Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

MIT student uses AI to design buildings with less concrete“The time horizon of when these things need to be implemented is relatively short if we want to make an impact before global temperatures have already risen too high. My PhD research will be developing a framework for how that could be done with concrete construction,' said Jackson Jewett.
Source: IntEngineering - 🏆 287. / 63 Read more »