, the economists say more frequent use of up-front experiments would result in more effective environmental policymaking in areas ranging from pollution control to timber harvesting across the world.is a cornerstone of science and is increasingly embedded in nonenvironmental social programs, it is virtually absent in environmental programs," the researchers wrote."Strengthening the culture of experimentation in the environmental community will require changes in norms and incentives.
Members include colleagues from UW and scholars in behavioral environmental policy from Carnegie Mellon University, Johns Hopkins University, Purdue University, the University of Texas-Austin, the University of Wisconsin-Madison and several key European universities. The group of UW economists include Todd Cherry, Jacob Hochard, Stephen Newbold, Jason Shogren, Linda Thunström and Klaas van 't Veld.
"To help strengthen inferences about cause and effect, environmental organizations could rely more on formal experimentation within their programs, which would leverage the power of science while maintaining a 'learning by doing' approach," the economists wrote. The paper notes that two agencies that regulate environmental practices—the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Agriculture—have embedded formal experimentation in their environmental programs fewer than six times in the past 30 years. In Europe, the practice is even less frequent. The same goes for nongovernmental organizations.
Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: NBCPhiladelphia - 🏆 569. / 51 Read more »
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »