While explaining why one of the four arguments these six states put forward was convincing, Roberts also criticized court reformers, who correctly recognize that the general public is suffering due to the right-wing’s forcible enacting of its values on the rest of the country.It has become a disturbing feature of some recent opinions to criticize the decisions with which they disagree as going beyond the proper role of the judiciary,” Roberts wrote.
”One of those three, Justice Elena Kagan, wrote the dissent, and countered Roberts, arguing that the court’s conservative wing is engaged in judicial activism. “The result here is that the Court substitutes itself for Congress and the Executive Branch in making national policy about student-loan forgiveness,” Kagan wrote. “Congress authorized the forgiveness plan ; the Secretary put it in place; and the President would have been accountable for its success or failure.