A Lesson From Credit Suisse On The Unintended Consequences Of Enforcing Yesterday’s Policies

  • 📰 Forbes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 27 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 53%

Education Education Headlines News

Education Education Latest News,Education Education Headlines

Credit Suisse has its balance of consequences wrong. It's punishing its people for doing what it needs them to do.

A lot of what made sense yesterday, before Credit Suisse failed, no longer makes sense. The Gardening Leave and claw back policies were designed to increase retention of top performers.

Those people are going to be looking for jobs one way or another. The best course of action is to enable their transitions, not impede them.They keeps switching costs high. Some companies hiring Credit Suisse investment bankers will offset some of their clawed back bonuses. All leavers lose 90-days of productivity.They’re not good for the people thinking about leaving. They feel worse about Credit Suisse.

They’re not good for Credit Suisse’s reputation. The publicity is awful. Potential lawsuits could be painful.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 394. in EDUCATİON

Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines