“It was BVAS that exposed that as it were, and the fact that the BVAS report was relied on. But we have to be careful; which of the BVAS reports was relied on? Was it what was transmitted to the server – to the backend – or was it the BVAS itself?”, he further stated.
Osaze-Uzzi explained that the APC obtained a certified copy of the initial server report the remaining data was transmitted by the BVAS hardware.
And the court accepted it? Where were they during submission of writings.
I don’t think we should hold party responsible for all this shortcomings in the election, why can’t the government work on their parastatals what’s inecnigeria looking at for election to be rigged? Any manipulation during election inecnigeria should be call 2 d court not party
Ex-INEC director , the cruise master!! What Bvas Is then Announced Demola as a winner , if you said it's incomplete Bvas🙄🙄
Ex. Inec. A joke
So Apc no fit calm down get complete info before the make case. The same they run this government. Just to force themselves on people
this kind of reports is acceptable from an EX-DIRECTOR
That means inec used incomplete BVAS to deliver Adeleke as governor. Period
I don't understand 🙄
Indeed!!! But it was signed and stamped ..... SMH
Why is INEC giving out incomplete BNAS report? Tufia.