This memo comes from the “Practicum Education Department,” and it informs recipients that “we have decided to remove the term ‘field’ from our curriculum and practice and replace it with the term ‘practicum.’” The school’s reasoning for this important change is this: “This change supports anti-racist social work practice by replacing language that could be considered anti-Black or anti-immigrant in favor of inclusive language.
I am always gobsmacked by these things when I consider the reasoning process that must go on in the minds of people who support them.
Maybe I am being glib. Slavery is nothing to joke about. But at a certain point, the people making these types of language changes aren’t even taking themselves seriously. I am just following their lead. This has become a common type of story, after all. A key moment in the rise of language policing in our culture occurred when Harvard University and others moved away from using the term “master” because of its association with the American enslavement of black people.
It can be hard to stop your own momentum once you get going in any, uh, practicum of human endeavor. The people behind USC’s new policy, working with the “Eliminate Racism Grand Challenge for Social Work,” have mastered the art of overthinking the moral implications of connotations of words — even connotations they have merely imagined. If, however, they actually wish to help racial justice as a movement, they should stop being such an effective embarrassment to it.
Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »