is not a historic candidate for Speaker. He is a prop. Despite being Black, he supports a policy agenda intent on upholding and perpetuating white supremacy. His name being in the mix is not progress — it’s pathetic.”, partly, “I’d be happy to sit down and debate our policies one on one whenever you’d like.” But the rest of the tweet conveyed obvious disappointment that Bush had taken the low road, an expression of regret that he later expanded on in“It was just blatantly outrageous.
There was no sign from Bush that she will take Donalds up on his offer of a debate on the merits of policy. If anything, she poured more scorn on him,at Donalds on Jan. 5, “You’re being used. It helps you politically at the expense of our community. THAT’S what’s shameful. It’s clear which party promotes white supremacist chaos and which works against it.”
Bush’s repeated use of “white supremacy” explains the divide here. The term does not actually mean ugly people who think that white people are superior to other races — that’s too “reductive,” as we will see. According to leftists like Bush, “white supremacy” is actually all of American society — its institutions, values, and every single person in it who doesn’t want to tear it all down.
DIE*