"My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks," the conservative Barrett said, according to the Louisville Courier Journal. She said the high court is defined by"judicial philosophies" instead of personal political views. "Judicial philosophies are not the same as political parties," Barrett said.
"RELATED: What the Supreme Court's order means for the future of Roe v. WadeShe also said, according to the Courier Journal, that she identifies as an"originalist" and citing Justice Stephen Breyer as an example of"pragmatism."Breyer, along with other justices, often lament the public perception of the court as overtly political.
The optics on this are so awful even blind people are flinching.
I refrain myself from calling her 'justice.'
The Supreme Court is a joke now. A sad one at that.
She is full of hot air she accepted so that she could push her political views she lied about Roe v Wade she didn't think about the woman whom this would affect
Anyone lacking this amount of awareness needs to be removed from the court.
That sounds like something a partisan hack would say.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣
🤔 did she recently go to a rally on voting rights?
Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »