A cheerleader's Snapchat profanity gets U.S. Supreme Court's attention

  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 38 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 97%

Education Education Headlines News

Education Education Latest News,Education Education Headlines

Two days after Mahanoy Area High School in Pennsylvania held its cheerleading tryouts, ninth-grader Brandi Levy was still fuming about being passed over for a spot on the varsity squad.

While a younger girl had been picked for varsity, Levy was facing another year relegated to the junior varsity cheer squad. That Saturday afternoon in May 2017 - standing not on school grounds but in the Cocoa Hut convenience store in Mahanoy City in the state's coal country - Levy pulled out her cellphone and, along with a friend, raised her middle finger to the camera.

For Levy, now 18 and a college student studying accounting, the punishment at the time felt instinctively wrong. Backed by the American Civil Liberties Union, Levy and her parents sued the Mahanoy Area School District seeking reinstatement to the squad and a judgment that her First Amendment rights had been violated.

President Joe Biden's administration supports the district, arguing that off-campus student speech deserves broad protection unless it threatens the school community or targets specific individuals, groups or school functions. "If a student on the weekend uses her private email to blast harassing messages to school email accounts, where did the speech happen?" the district asked in a legal filing.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

You go girl. I support you with the middlefinger

great case

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 2. in EDUCATİON

Education Education Latest News, Education Education Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Weighs Limits to Schools’ Power to Patrol Student SpeechThe Supreme Court signaled reluctance Wednesday to extend throughout the internet campus rules that curb student speech, in a case involving a Pennsylvania cheerleader who posted profanities on Snapchat. It would be beneficial if all Americans learned to keep their speech and their posts respectful and that includes high school students!! She did not get what she wanted and she reacted with an inappropriate post!! Her parents are the ones to resolve this by setting good examples! Sorry...no....u can’t. Like any job etc. You will be opening the door for the situation that happened down south a couple months ago where they were calling the black kids on the football team the N-word but their excuse was it was off-campus.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Can A School Punish A Cheerleader For Cursing On Snapchat? Supreme Court Leans Toward ‘No’Justices suggested some limits on students’ off-campus speech could be warranted even as they questioned the cheerleader’s punishment. No Bullshit Let’s ask the actually experts openargs
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Can A School Punish A Cheerleader For Cursing On Snapchat? Supreme Court Leans Toward ‘No’Justices suggested some limits on students’ off-campus speech could be warranted even as they questioned the cheerleader’s punishment. No, not at all it is freedom of speech Is it cussing, vulgarity or cursing liken to one putting a curse on another or a group of people which is impossible to do in our modernized society? Are you interested in Bitcoin Investment? where you can get to earn at least 2-25% daily ROI without losing a dime or sending money to anyone. you can inbox me and I will guide you on how you can do it yourself. Bitcoin
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »

Wary Supreme Court weighs student's Snapchat profanity caseWASHINGTON (AP) — A wary Supreme Court on Wednesday weighed whether public schools can discipline students for things they say off campus, worrying about overly restricting speech on the one hand and leaving educators powerless to deal with bullying on the other. The justices, hearing arguments in the case of a 14-year-old high school freshman's Snapchat F-bombs, struggled to fit the need to protect students' political and religious expression with the ability of schools to get at disruptive, even potentially dangerous, speech that occurs outside the school setting. In one of many examples members of the court offered, Justice Elena Kagan described boys who keep a sexually charged online ranking of girls based on their looks. “You can't put people in jail for commenting on people’s appearance, but shouldn't a school be able to deal with it?” Kagan asked. Easy, the answer is no This is ridiculous No wtf
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »