that students could move through at their own pace; and putting more practical and vocational elements into the HSC.
“At no time did Professor Masters analyse the details of the existing NSW syllabuses or visit a NSW school during school hours. It’s hard to know how this can even be described as a curriculum review.” Professor Masters said he and his team did visit schools.Professor Masters said his report reflected the aspirations and concerns of the community after months of consultation.
Mr Latham said the Berejiklian government should stop pretending that the Masters review was something it was not. “Government spin doctors sold it to the media as a return to spelling bees and times tables in the classroom, yet the 118-page document makes no mention of these practices,” he wrote. Mr Shoebridge and Labor MP Anthony D’Adam have written dissenting reports. Labor MP Courtney Houssos broadly supported it - which is Labor’s official position - but suggested some amendments in a dissenting report.
JordsBaker This is all over the place. Education is not the whim of a school or teacher. It needs to be highly industrialised. Core such as sciences and maths don't need to be reinvented by everyone, build best practice and follow it. Humanities, establish a value system and build on it.
JordsBaker Ok so we go back to old encyclopaedia do we